Unpriced custody
This is one result from the Are You Undercharging Clients? calculator. It describes an account where the work, risk, and response burden you carry is materially ahead of what the price communicates. The economics may still work today. The offer is what stopped being honest.
What this profile means
Custody is the responsibility a customer hands over so they do not have to staff it themselves: watching the system, answering when it breaks, keeping the integration alive, absorbing the edge cases. In this profile, the calculator sees a lot of custody on your side and a price that still talks like a tool subscription or a simple retainer.
Unlike a Custody subsidy, the price here may still cover the raw cost of the hidden hours. What it does not cover is the meaning of the relationship. The customer thinks they bought access. They are consuming ownership.
How accounts drift into this
Retainers age in one direction. Dependency rises: what was annoying-but-workable when they signed is now work-stops-when-it-breaks. Response expectations rise with it: the written contract says next business day, but the last four incidents got you paged, so the operational truth is paged. Meanwhile the price was set against the original, smaller relationship and reviewed never.
None of these steps feels like a pricing event. That is why the drift survives: there is no single moment where anyone chose the mismatch.
Why this costs more than margin
The obvious damage is financial: the effective hourly rate on the account sinks month by month while the fee stays flat. The less obvious damage shows up at renewal. Because the buyer believes they are paying for access, they will eventually compare your price against a cheaper tool that offers access. Your differentiation, the relief you provide when things go wrong, is absent from the comparison because it is absent from the offer. You can lose a custody account to a capability competitor purely because your invoice described you as one.
Signs that confirm it
- You appear in the customer's internal runbooks, escalation lists, or onboarding docs.
- They dissolved or never created the internal role that would own this.
- Incidents route to you first, regardless of what the SLA says.
- The price has not moved while the dependency visibly has.
The move: expose one burden, then reprice at renewal
People searching "how to raise prices on existing clients without losing them" usually get told to justify the raise with added value. For custody accounts the sequencing matters more than the justification. Pick the single burden that would matter most at renewal, the one the buyer would miss within a week if it stopped. Make that one visible now: a monthly prevention note, a recovery log, a short status summary that the invoice approver reads.
Then use the renewal, not a mid-term letter, as the pricing moment. Renewals are when buyers expect terms to move, and by then the burden has a paper trail. Frame the change as the offer catching up with what the relationship already is, because that is the truth. Expect to name a number with evidence behind it rather than a percentage with apology behind it.
Boundaries
If the work is fully invisible and the buyer would be startled to learn it exists, start softer: the Hidden subsidy profile covers the visibility-first path. If the price already fails to cover the raw hidden hours, the situation is more urgent than this page assumes. And if you cannot reliably staff the response level the new price would advertise, fix that before selling it: that failure mode has its own profile, Promise risk.