What should
you charge for?
Three questions. One honest recommendation - from flat subscription to pay-per-result and every hybrid in between.
Business Application
Select your product or service type (what it delivers), your own cost structure, and buyer behavior (their main reason for purchasing), and immediately get the best pricing strategy for your specific situation, including its strengths and weaknesses.
Find a detailed explanation right below this free tool.
This free tool is based on Pay per result might be the unit test for pricing AI SaaS.
Try my other tools.
Most pricing debates start with "how much." Wrong starting point. The unit you charge for shapes everything downstream: how buyers perceive risk, how your revenue scales with usage, and whether your margins improve or erode as you grow.
A SaaS product charging per seat behaves differently from one charging per result, even at identical revenue. The seat model rewards headcount growth. The result model rewards the outcome your buyer hired you for. Pick the wrong unit and you spend years fighting misalignment between what you deliver and what you bill for.
This tool exists to short-circuit that process. Three questions. One recommendation with honest trade-offs.
You answer three questions about your product:
The tool cross-references your answers and returns one of seven pricing models, along with its strengths and weaknesses. No email required. No gated PDF.
Your result links to a full profile page that explains the model in depth. Browse all seven:
Each profile covers when the model works, where it breaks down, and the conditions that make it dangerous. Read your result profile before locking in a pricing page.
Founders choosing a pricing model for the first time. If you are pre-launch or early-stage, picking the right unit now saves a painful migration later. Changing your pricing unit after customers are on board is one of the hardest pivots in SaaS.
Product leaders questioning an existing model. If revenue is growing but margins are thinning, or if churn spikes whenever usage drops, the pricing unit might be working against you. Run the tool to see whether your current model still fits.
Anyone building an AI product. AI changes cost structures and buyer expectations simultaneously. A model that worked for traditional software can misfire when inference costs scale unpredictably or when the buyer expects to pay for outcomes, not access.
Your recommendation is not a label. It is a brief with context:
The goal is a decision you can defend, not a guess you hope works out.
Your pricing unit tells buyers where you sit in the market. But it is not the only signal. If you are also trying to figure out whether your product competes on premium value or commodity efficiency, the Premium vs. Commodity Spectrum tool pairs well with this one. Run both and you will have a clearer picture of how to price and where to position.
Building an AI product specifically? The AI Flywheel Test helps you score whether your product has a real moat or just a temporary head start. Pricing power erodes fast without defensibility.
Scroll up to the tool, answer three questions, and get your recommendation now.
Version 1.0
It evaluates three inputs: what your product delivers, how your costs scale, and why buyers purchase. The combination of those three factors narrows the field to a specific pricing unit, whether that is flat subscription, per seat, usage-based, take rate, pay per result, or a hybrid. Each recommendation includes strengths and weaknesses so you can weigh trade-offs before committing.
The tool can recommend seven distinct pricing models: pay per result, hybrid base plus outcome, hybrid base plus usage, usage-based, take rate, per seat, and flat subscription. Each result links to a dedicated profile that explains when the model works, when it fails, and what to watch for.
No. The three inputs, delivery type, cost structure, and buyer behavior, apply to software, services, marketplaces, and physical products with digital components. If your offering has a repeatable unit of value and you need to attach a price to it, the tool can help.
Usage-based pricing charges for consumption, like API calls or storage. Pay-per-result pricing charges for the outcome the buyer wanted, like a completed task or a measurable business result. The distinction matters because usage tracks your costs while results track the buyer's value. The tool helps you figure out which alignment fits your situation.
Yes, and the tool may recommend exactly that. Two hybrid options exist: base plus outcome, where a fixed subscription covers access and a variable fee rewards results, and base plus usage, where a base fee provides predictability and metered usage scales with consumption. Hybrids reduce risk for both you and the buyer when a single model creates too much exposure on one side.
No. The Pricing Unit Picker is completely free with no account required. Answer three questions and get your recommendation immediately.